In Re Sean K. Hornbeck

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Sean K. Hornbeck

198 A.3d 775

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2018

Docket18-BG-1034

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.3d 775 (In Re Sean K. Hornbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Sean K. Hornbeck, 198 A.3d 775 (D.C. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of Tennessee after he indicated that his disability had abated; this court's October 5, 2018, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the court order or the required D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Sean K. Hornbeck is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194 , 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's period of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of Tennessee after he indicated that his disability had abated; this court's October 5, 2018, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the court order or the required D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Sean K. Hornbeck is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194 , 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's period of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.3d 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sean-k-hornbeck-dc-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack