In Re Sean K. Hornbeck

198 A.3d 775
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 2018·No. 18-BG-1034·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of Tennessee after he indicated that his disability had abated; this court's October 5, 2018, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the court order or the required D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Sean K. Hornbeck is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194 , 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's period of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Sean K. Hornbeck, 198 A.3d 775 (D.C. 2018).

198 A.3d 775 (In Re Sean K. Hornbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)