In re Seamless Rubber Co.

34 App. D.C. 357, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5812
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 1910
DocketNo. 612
StatusPublished

This text of 34 App. D.C. 357 (In re Seamless Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Seamless Rubber Co., 34 App. D.C. 357, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5812 (D.C. Cir. 1910).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents refusing registration of the word “Kantleek” as a trademark for atomizers, fountain syringes, face bags, ice bags, and water bottles. Upon the authority of Re Central Consumers Co. [358]*35832 App. D. C. 523, and Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co. v. Standard Paint Co. 90 C. C. A. 195, 163 Fed. 977, tbe decision of tbe Commissioner of Patents is affirmed, and tbe clerk is directed to certify these proceedings as by law required. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co. v. Standard Paint Co.
163 F. 977 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 App. D.C. 357, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-seamless-rubber-co-cadc-1910.