In re Seaman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Seaman

286 A.2d 509, 60 N.J. 136, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 226

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJanuary 24, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 286 A.2d 509 (In re Seaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Seaman, 286 A.2d 509, 60 N.J. 136, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 226 (N.J. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cuelam.

Bespondent stands convicted of misconduct in office, extortion and conspiracy to commit each of these crimes. He has been sentenced to State Prison for a term of 1-3 years and fined $5,000. The precise nature of the criminal activity is set forth in full detail in 114 N. J. Super. 19 (App. Div. 1971).

The circumstances of the case permit of no appropriate discipline short of disbarment.

The order of the Court is that the name of the respondent be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

For disbarment: Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.

Opposed: None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI