In Re: Sealed Case
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) IN RE: SEALED CASE ) Misc. Nos. 12-196, 12-197 (RCL) _______________________________________)
ORDER
The Court issued a memorandum and order on May 3, 2012 under seal in the
miscellaneous case numbers listed above. As part of that memorandum and order, the Court
required the parties to file proposed redacted versions that could be provided to the public. On
May 23, the parties filed a joint proposed redacted version. The petitioners requested two
additional reactions to which the government objected. The Court determines that the parties’
jointly requested redactions, and the petitioners’ requested redactions, are legitimate. See United
States v. Hubbard, 650 F.2d 293, 317-322 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (listing factors relevant to a court’s
decision to unseal documents). It is therefore hereby
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court’s Office provide the public with a copy of the
redacted version of the Court’s May 3, 2012 memorandum and order attached hereto, and of this
order.
SO ORDERED.
Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on May 25, 2012.
`1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: Sealed Case (In Re: Sealed Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.