In re Seagro

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Seagro

90 Ohio St. 3d 1459

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 31, 2000

Docket00-1940

StatusPublished

This text of 90 Ohio St. 3d 1459 (In re Seagro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Seagro, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1459 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 76825. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal as of right. It appears from the court of appeals’ opinion that the appeal involves termination of parental rights. The appellant failed to state in the notice of appeal that the appeal involved termination of parental rights as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(B)(I). Furthermore, appellant failed to timely file this appeal within twenty days from the entry of judgment as required by S.CtPrae.R. II(2)(A)(l)(a). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 76825. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal as of right. It appears from the court of appeals’ opinion that the appeal involves termination of parental rights. The appellant failed to state in the notice of appeal that the appeal involved termination of parental rights as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(B)(I). Furthermore, appellant failed to timely file this appeal within twenty days from the entry of judgment as required by S.CtPrae.R. II(2)(A)(l)(a). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 Ohio St. 3d 1459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-seagro-ohio-2000.