in Re S.D.
This text of in Re S.D. (in Re S.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-17-00233-CV _________________
IN RE S.D.
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 418th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 16-06-06557-CV ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, S.D., petitioned to compel the Judge of the 418th District Court of
Montgomery County, Texas, to set a hearing on pending motions and render a
decision regarding access and possession in a suit involving a child in the care of the
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Mandamus relief is proper to
correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In
re Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 273 S.W.3d 637, 643 (Tex. 2009). After
reviewing the petition and the responses of the real parties in interest, we conclude
that Relator has not shown that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the
petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on July 14, 2017 Opinion Delivered August 3, 2017
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re S.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sd-texapp-2017.