In re Scurry

529 S.E.2d 542, 339 S.C. 396, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 66
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 13, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 529 S.E.2d 542 (In re Scurry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Scurry, 529 S.E.2d 542, 339 S.C. 396, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 66 (S.C. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on July 26, 1999, for a period of ninety days, retroactive to June 9, 1999. He has now filed an [397]*397affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

ERNEST A. FINNEY, JR.,

CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 S.E.2d 542, 339 S.C. 396, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scurry-sc-2000.