In re Scully

108 F. 372, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided May 2, 1901·No. No. 968·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

I think the learned referee was right in deciding that the mere relation of attorney at law did not authorize Mr. Hunsicker to vote in behalf of his clients at the election of the trustee (In re Blankfein [D. C.] 97 Fed. 191; In re Eagles [D. C.] 99 Fed. 695; In re Richards [D. C.] 103 Fed. 849); [373] and, since it clearly appeared by the testimony taken at that meeting that the bankrupt was insolvent when Catharine Lenahan’s execution issued, I agree also in the conclusion that the lien of her levy was avoided by clause “f” of section 67, and therefore that she was not disqualified to take part in the election. The petition is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Scully, 108 F. 372, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256 (E.D. Pa. 1901).

108 F. 372 (In re Scully) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abraham v. Shinberg
190 F.2d 595 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)
Schieber v. Hamre
10 F.2d 119 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)
In re Lazoris
120 F. 716 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Wisconsin, 1903)