In re Scruggs
Opinion
ORDER
J. BRATTON DAVIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the trustee’s motion1 on behalf of the debtors to avoid an alleged post-petition trans[3]*3fer of the debtors’ residence pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 549(a).2
FACTS
On July 28, 1983, pursuant to foreclosure proceedings instituted by Colonial Mortgage Company, the Master-in-Equity of Spartanburg County executed his deed conveying to a third party the real estate in which the debtors resided.
On August 26, 1983, the debtors filed their petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.
On December 22, 1983, the trustee filed this motion to avoid the transfer of property by the Master-in-Equity.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Because the Master-in-Equity executed his deed prior to the filing of the debtors’ petition for relief, this court is of the opinion that the transfer in question is not avoidable under 11 U.S.C. § 549(a). See, Graham v. Blanton (In re Graham), 35 B.R. 15 (Bankr.D.S.C.1983).
Even if the Master-in-Equity’s delivery of the deed and its subsequent recording were postpetition transfers, the transfers would fall within the proscription of 11 U.S.C. § 549(c)3 — thus, they would not be avoidable under 11 U.S.C. § 549(a) — because prior to the filing of a copy of the debtor’s petition for relief in the office of the Register of Mesne Conveyances for Spartanburg County, these transfers were so far perfected under state law that a bona fide purchaser could not “acquire an interest that is superior to the interest of” [a] “good faith or judicial sale purchaser.” See, In re Graham, supra.
ORDER
For the reasons stated above the motion to avoid the transfer of the debtors’ residence pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 549(a) should be, and hereby is, denied.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
47 B.R. 2 (In re Scruggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.