In re Scriffignano

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Scriffignano

616 A.2d 614, 532 Pa. 493, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 570

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 12, 1992

DocketNo. 878 Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Board File No. C2-92-019

StatusPublished

This text of 616 A.2d 614 (In re Scriffignano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Scriffignano, 616 A.2d 614, 532 Pa. 493, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 570 (Pa. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 1992, Philip J. Scriffignano having been disbarred from the practice of law in [494]*494the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated November 20, 1991; the said Philip J. Scrifflgnano having been directed on June 11, 1992, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed in this Court, it is

ORDERED that Philip J. Scrifflgnano is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 1992, Philip J. Scriffignano having been disbarred from the practice of law in [494]*494the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated November 20, 1991; the said Philip J. Scrifflgnano having been directed on June 11, 1992, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed in this Court, it is

ORDERED that Philip J. Scrifflgnano is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 A.2d 614, 532 Pa. 493, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scriffignano-pa-1992.