In Re SCOTTSDALE MEDICAL PAVILION, Debtor. Scottsdale Medical Pavilion, Appellant, v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. in Rehabilitation, Appellee

Ninth Circuit

In Re SCOTTSDALE MEDICAL PAVILION, Debtor. Scottsdale Medical Pavilion, Appellant, v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. in Rehabilitation, Appellee

52 F.3d 244, 1995 Daily Journal DAR 4470, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2579, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7855, 1995 WL 153391

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 1995

Docket93-17165

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 52 F.3d 244 (In Re SCOTTSDALE MEDICAL PAVILION, Debtor. Scottsdale Medical Pavilion, Appellant, v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. in Rehabilitation, Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re SCOTTSDALE MEDICAL PAVILION, Debtor. Scottsdale Medical Pavilion, Appellant, v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. in Rehabilitation, Appellee, 52 F.3d 244, 1995 Daily Journal DAR 4470, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2579, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7855, 1995 WL 153391 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Scottsdale Medical Pavilion appeals the order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel which upheld an order of the bankruptcy court sequestering $15,605, which had been collected as rent before the bankruptcy proceedings started. The bankruptcy court ruled that the money was cash collateral subject to Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company’s security interest in an assignment of rents from Scottsdale, which was given as part of a deed of trust.

We have carefully reviewed the record, the law, and the BAP’s excellent opinion. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the BAP’s opinion, which we adopt as our own. See In re Scottsdale Medical Pavilion, 159 B.R. 295 (9th Cir. BAP 1993).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Scottsdale Medical Pavilion appeals the order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel which upheld an order of the bankruptcy court sequestering $15,605, which had been collected as rent before the bankruptcy proceedings started. The bankruptcy court ruled that the money was cash collateral subject to Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company’s security interest in an assignment of rents from Scottsdale, which was given as part of a deed of trust.

We have carefully reviewed the record, the law, and the BAP’s excellent opinion. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the BAP’s opinion, which we adopt as our own. See In re Scottsdale Medical Pavilion, 159 B.R. 295 (9th Cir. BAP 1993).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 F.3d 244, 1995 Daily Journal DAR 4470, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2579, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7855, 1995 WL 153391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scottsdale-medical-pavilion-debtor-scottsdale-medical-pavilion-ca9-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack