in Re Scott Van Dyke
This text of in Re Scott Van Dyke (in Re Scott Van Dyke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 28, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00556-CV
IN RE SCOTT VAN DYKE, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On June 23, 2009, relator, Scott Van Dyke, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland, presiding judge of the 133rd District Court of Harris County, to vacate her May 4, 2009 order denying his motion for entry of judgment nunc pro tunc and her June 22, 2009 order denying his motion for entry of judgment in accordance with this court=s opinion.
Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and lift the stay issued on June 24, 2009.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Scott Van Dyke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scott-van-dyke-texapp-2009.