in Re: Scott Stanley
This text of in Re: Scott Stanley (in Re: Scott Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-06-145-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: SCOTT STANLEY
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Castillo
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, Scott Stanley, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on March 28, 2006 and a motion for emergency relief on April 4, 2006. Having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief, the Court is of the opinion that (1) Relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and, thus, (2) the petition and motion must be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED and the motion for emergency relief is DENIED AS MOOT.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 5th day of April 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Scott Stanley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scott-stanley-texapp-2006.