in Re Scott Sloan
This text of in Re Scott Sloan (in Re Scott Sloan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00389-CV
In re Scott Sloan
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Scott Sloan seeks an original writ of habeas corpus challenging his
pre-trial confinement as unlawful under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act.
This Court has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters; our original
jurisdiction to entertain applications for writ of habeas corpus extends solely to the actions of
judges in civil cases. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(d). Our habeas corpus jurisdiction in
criminal matters is appellate only. In re Hall, No. 03-17-00778-CV, 2017 WL 5985541, at *1
(Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 30, 2017, orig. proceeding). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of
habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts,
the county courts, or a judge of those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05.
Accordingly, we dismiss Sloan’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want of
jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). __________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly
Filed: July 7, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Scott Sloan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scott-sloan-texapp-2022.