In re Scott

Supreme Court

In re Scott

136 S. Ct. 171, 193 L. Ed. 2d 216, 84 U.S.L.W. 3175, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4762

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 5, 2015·No. No. 15–5012.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner have repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner have repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

In re Scott, 136 S. Ct. 171, 193 L. Ed. 2d 216, 84 U.S.L.W. 3175, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4762 (U.S. 2015).

Pincite

136 S. Ct. 171 (In re Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related