In re Scott R.
This text of 548 A.2d 1388 (In re Scott R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The mother of Scott R. appeals the judgment of the District Court (Bangor; Cox, J.) terminating her parental rights under 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055(1)(B)(2) (Supp.1987). We affirm. Reunification efforts are not a discrete element of the Department of Human Services’ burden of proof in termination proceedings. In Re Joseph P., 532 A.2d 1031, 1035 (Me.1987); In Re Daniel C., 480 A.2d 766, 770 (Me.1984). We find that clear and convincing evidence supports the District Court’s decision that termination is in the child’s best interest and that the mother is unable or unwilling to take responsibility for the child within a time reasonably calculated to meet his needs.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 A.2d 1388, 1988 Me. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scott-r-me-1988.