in Re: Scott Fisher and Kristi Fisher
This text of in Re: Scott Fisher and Kristi Fisher (in Re: Scott Fisher and Kristi Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered November 2, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-00416-CV
IN RE SCOTT FISHER AND KRISTI FISHER, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-00653-2011
ORDER Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia
Before the Court is relators’ June 4, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus. In
the petition, relators challenge the trial court’s May 26, 2021 order granting real
party in interest Christopher Fitzwater’s motion to compel turnover. Pursuant to
their interlocutory appeals pending under cause number 05-21-00696-CV, relators
also challenge the trial court’s July 26, 2021 orders (1) denying the emergency
motion to vacate the September 25, 2019 order appointing Fitzwater as receiver
and (2) granting the joint motion to strike the emergency motion to vacate. We
conclude that these proceedings should be decided together. Accordingly, on the Court’s own motion, we ORDER cause number 05-21-
00416-CV CONSOLIDATED into cause number 05-21-00696-CV. We DIRECT
the Clerk of this Court to remove all documents from cause number 05-21-00416-
CV and refile them in cause number 05-21-00696-CV and to treat cause number
05-21-00416-CV as a closed case. We ORDER that all future filings bear only
cause number 05-21-00696-CV.
We request that the real parties file a response to relators’ petition for writ of
mandamus on or before December 1, 2021. We also EXTEND the deadline for
appellees’ brief to December 1, 2021. All other current deadlines in cause number
05-21-00696-CV shall remain in place. The real parties may include the response
within their appellees’ brief or file the response as a separate brief in accordance
with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.4. In accordance
with this consolidation order, that response should be filed in cause number 05-21-
00696-CV.
Further, based on our review, the mandamus record is not adequately sworn
or certified under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52. TEX. R. APP. P.
52.7(A)(1) (record); see TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (appendix); In re Hughes,
607 S.W.3d 136, 138 n.2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020, orig.
proceeding) (noting that to qualify as sworn under Rule 52, relator must attach
documents to affidavit or unsworn declaration conforming to section 132.001 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code). We accordingly DIRECT relators
to file, by November 9, 2021, a sworn or certified copy of the mandamus record in
cause number 05-21-00696-CV. We caution relator that failure to file a properly
authenticated record by this deadline may result in the denial of this original
proceeding for non-compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to all
parties, the trial judge, and the Dallas District Court Clerk.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Scott Fisher and Kristi Fisher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scott-fisher-and-kristi-fisher-texapp-2021.