In re: Scott B. Blumenfeld
This text of 130 A.3d 951 (In re: Scott B. Blumenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely suspending respondent from -the practice of law with the right to apply for reinstatement in six months, see Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Blumenfeld, 439 Md. 241, 95 A.3d 628 (2014), this court’s September 29, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why the functionally equivalent discipline in the form of a suspension for a period of six months, with his reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness, should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent failed to file .a response .to this court’s order to show cause but filed an affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on November 14, 2014, it is
ORDERED that Scott B. Blumenfeld is hereby suspended from the practice of law *952 in the District of Columbia for a period of six months, nunc pro tunc to November 14, 2014. Reinstatement is contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 A.3d 951, 2014 WL 11149721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scott-b-blumenfeld-dc-2014.