in Re: Scoggins Construction Company, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 22, 2007
Docket13-06-00492-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Scoggins Construction Company, Inc. (in Re: Scoggins Construction Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Scoggins Construction Company, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

NUMBER 13-06-415-CV


SCOGGINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant,



v.



HECTOR G. LEAL AND SAN BENITO INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellees.

_______________________________________________________



On appeal from the 107th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

NUMBER 13-06-492-CV



IN RE SCOGGINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.



On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

_________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Scoggins Construction Company, Inc. sought review of the trial court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration through an interlocutory appeal and a petition for writ of mandamus. The parties have now filed joint motions to vacate and remand in accordance with agreement of the parties. In their motion, the parties request that this Court vacate the trial court's interlocutory order and remand this case for further proceedings in accordance with the agreement of the parties. The parties further requests that costs be taxed against the party incurring same.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motions to vacate and to remand in accordance with agreement of the parties, is of the opinion that the motions should be granted. The joint motions to vacate and to remand in accordance with agreement of the parties are GRANTED. The trial court's interlocutory order denying motion to compel arbitration is hereby VACATED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the agreement of the parties.



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 22nd day of March, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Scoggins Construction Company, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scoggins-construction-company-inc-texapp-2007.