In re Scinto

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Scinto

856 A.2d 25, 181 N.J. 295, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1033

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedSeptember 9, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 856 A.2d 25 (In re Scinto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Scinto, 856 A.2d 25, 181 N.J. 295, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1033 (N.J. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-066 and DRB 04-067, concluding that MICHAEL R. SCINTO of VIENNA, VIRGINIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL R. SCINTO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI