In re Scinto

Fourth Circuit

In re Scinto

475 F. App'x 13

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1457

StatusPublished

This text of 475 F. App'x 13 (In re Scinto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Scinto, 475 F. App'x 13 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Scinto, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his coram nobis petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, [14]*14we deny the mandamus petition and Scin-to’s motion to stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Scinto, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his coram nobis petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, [14]*14we deny the mandamus petition and Scin-to’s motion to stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 F. App'x 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scinto-ca4-2012.