In re Schweinert
269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2381
This text of 269 F. 1020 (In re Schweinert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Schweinert, 269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2381 (D.C. Cir. 1921).
Opinion
Appeal from the refusal of the Commissioner of Patents to grant a patent for a tire valve. We agree with the Commissioner that the applicant has made no patentable advance over the prior art. The decision is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
269 F. 1020, 50 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schweinert-cadc-1921.