In Re: Schwarz
This text of In Re: Schwarz (In Re: Schwarz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: STANLEY G. SCHWARZ, CHRISTOPHER M. MACHECA, MICHAEL GLANCY, Appellants ______________________
2015-1327 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/349,523. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
CHARLES JOHN ROGERS, Conley Rose, P.C., Houston, TX, argued for appellants. Also represented by STEWART N. MESHER, Austin, TX.
COKE STEWART, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 12, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Schwarz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schwarz-cafc-2015.