In re Schwartz

765 A.2d 1114
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 8, 2001
DocketNo. 627 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 765 A.2d 1114 (In re Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Schwartz, 765 A.2d 1114 (Pa. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2001, Madeline E. Schwartz having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated May 10, 2000; the said Madeline E. Schwartz having been directed on November 13, 2000, to inform this Court of any claim she has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Madeline E. Schwartz is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
765 A.2d 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schwartz-pa-2001.