In re Schunk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Schunk

247 A.D.2d 756, 668 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1850

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D.2d 756 (In re Schunk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schunk, 247 A.D.2d 756, 668 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated March 29, 1989, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of three years (Matter of Schunk, 148 AD2d 877). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement. He has also established, by clear and convincing evidence, that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and [757]*757he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated March 29, 1989, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of three years (Matter of Schunk, 148 AD2d 877). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement. He has also established, by clear and convincing evidence, that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and [757]*757he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D.2d 756, 668 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schunk-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack