In re Schulze
Opinion
ORDER DENYING DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER COMPELLING DEBTOR TO TURN OVER PROPERTY OF THE ESTATE, AND CANCELLING JULY 6, 2016 HEARING
This case is before the Court on the motion filed by the Debtor, Mark J. Schul-ze, entitled “Motion for Relief from Order Compelling Debtor to Turn Over Property of the Estate” (Docket #31, the “Motion”). The Chapter 7 Trustee filed an objection to the Motion, and the Motion is currently scheduled for a hearing to be held on July 6, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.
For the following reasons, the Court concludes that a hearing on the Motion is not necessary, and that the Motion must be denied.
The Motion seeks relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1), applicable in this bankruptcy ease under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024, from the order entered on October 21, 2015, entitled “Order Compelling Debtor to Turn Over Property of the Estate” (Docket # 24, the “Turnover Order”).1 The Motion seeks relief under Civil Rule 60(b)(l)’s “mistake” provision, based on the Debtor’s argument that this Court committed legal error when it entered the Turnover Order.
Under binding Sixth Circuit authority, such Motion had to be filed no later than the deadline for an appeal from the Turnover Order. See Townsend v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 486 F.3d 127, 133 (6th Cir. 2007); Pierce v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Ret. Fund for 1950 and 1974, 770 F.2d 449, 451-52 (6th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1104, 106 S.Ct. 890, 88 L.Ed.2d 925 (1986); Barrier v. Beaver, 712 F.2d 231, 234 (6th Cir. 1983).
In this case, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal from the October 21, 2015 Turnover Order was November 4, 2015, 14 days after the entry of the Turnover Order. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a)(1). But the Motion was not filed until May 25, 2016, more than six months after the time for appeal expired. For this reason, under [305] the Sixth Circuit eases cited above, this Court must deny the Motion as untimely.
For these reasons,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Motion (Docket # 31) is denied.
2. The hearing scheduled for July 6, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. is cancelled, as no longer necessary.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
560 B.R. 303 (In re Schulze) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.