In re Schultz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Schultz

115 A.D.2d 575, 496 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54996

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 115 A.D.2d 575 (In re Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schultz, 115 A.D.2d 575, 496 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Application by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law, § 90 [4]), (1) to strike the name of Marc Gil Schultz, an attorney admitted to practice in this court on January 31, 1973 from the roll of attorneys on the grounds that he has been convicted after a jury verdict of violating 18 USC § 1962 (d), (c), §§ 1341, 1342, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and was sentenced on October 15, 1985, or in the alternative, (2) to declare the continued suspension of the respondent for his conviction of a serious crime.

Application insofar as it seeks the respondent’s disbarment, denied. The issues raised by the petition containing the charges to be served upon respondent, including the facts which constituted the conviction of the serious crime (a Federal felony) and the respondent’s answer thereto are to be referred to Stanley Buchsbaum, Esq., 3101 Avenue I, Brooklyn, New York 11210 as a Special Referee to hear and to report, together with his findings.

The automatic suspension which arose upon the conviction of the serious crime shall continue until the further order of this court.

The Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts is authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in the court, as petitioner, against respondent and Robert H. Straus, Esq., Chief Counsel to the [576]*576committee, Suite 1200, Municipal Building, Brooklyn, New York, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law, § 90 [4]), (1) to strike the name of Marc Gil Schultz, an attorney admitted to practice in this court on January 31, 1973 from the roll of attorneys on the grounds that he has been convicted after a jury verdict of violating 18 USC § 1962 (d), (c), §§ 1341, 1342, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and was sentenced on October 15, 1985, or in the alternative, (2) to declare the continued suspension of the respondent for his conviction of a serious crime.

Application insofar as it seeks the respondent’s disbarment, denied. The issues raised by the petition containing the charges to be served upon respondent, including the facts which constituted the conviction of the serious crime (a Federal felony) and the respondent’s answer thereto are to be referred to Stanley Buchsbaum, Esq., 3101 Avenue I, Brooklyn, New York 11210 as a Special Referee to hear and to report, together with his findings.

The automatic suspension which arose upon the conviction of the serious crime shall continue until the further order of this court.

The Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts is authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in the court, as petitioner, against respondent and Robert H. Straus, Esq., Chief Counsel to the [576]*576committee, Suite 1200, Municipal Building, Brooklyn, New York, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 575, 496 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schultz-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack