In Re Schulte

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

In Re Schulte

1932 OK 855, 17 P.2d 687, 161 Okla. 206, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 495

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 20, 1932·No. 15492·Published

Opinion

ANDREWS, J.

Upon a review of the record in this case, we are of the opinion that the order of disbarment heretofore made in this case should be vacated, set aside, and held for naught; that the prayer of the complainants for the disbarment of the respondent should be denied, and that the respondent should be reinstated.

It is so ordered.

LESTER, C. J., and RILEY, KEENER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, Y. C. J., not voting.

Note.—See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 1113.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANDREWS, J.

Upon a review of the record in this case, we are of the opinion that the order of disbarment heretofore made in this case should be vacated, set aside, and held for naught; that the prayer of the complainants for the disbarment of the respondent should be denied, and that the respondent should be reinstated.

It is so ordered.

LESTER, C. J., and RILEY, KEENER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, Y. C. J., not voting.

Note.—See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 1113.

In Re Schulte, 1932 OK 855, 17 P.2d 687, 161 Okla. 206, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 495 (Okla. 1932).

Pincite

1932 OK 855 (In Re Schulte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.