In Re Schulte

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

In Re Schulte

1932 OK 855, 17 P.2d 687, 161 Okla. 206, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 495

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 20, 1932

Docket15492

StatusPublished

This text of 1932 OK 855 (In Re Schulte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Schulte, 1932 OK 855, 17 P.2d 687, 161 Okla. 206, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 495 (Okla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

ANDREWS, J.

Upon a review of the record in this case, we are of the opinion that the order of disbarment heretofore made in this case should be vacated, set aside, and held for naught; that the prayer of the complainants for the disbarment of the respondent should be denied, and that the respondent should be reinstated.

It is so ordered.

LESTER, C. J., and RILEY, KEENER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, Y. C. J., not voting.

Note.—See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 1113.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANDREWS, J.

Upon a review of the record in this case, we are of the opinion that the order of disbarment heretofore made in this case should be vacated, set aside, and held for naught; that the prayer of the complainants for the disbarment of the respondent should be denied, and that the respondent should be reinstated.

It is so ordered.

LESTER, C. J., and RILEY, KEENER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, Y. C. J., not voting.

Note.—See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 1113.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1932 OK 855, 17 P.2d 687, 161 Okla. 206, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schulte-okla-1932.