In re Schroll

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Schroll

63 A.3d 1217, 213 N.J. 391, 2013 WL 1704879, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 352

DecidedApril 17, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.3d 1217 (In re Schroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schroll, 63 A.3d 1217, 213 N.J. 391, 2013 WL 1704879, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 352 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-204, concluding that BRYAN C. SCHROLL of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.3(lack of diligence); RPC 1.4(b)(failure to communicate with client); RPC 4.1(a)(l)(false statement of fact to third person); RPC 8.4(c)(dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); and RPC 8.1(a)(misrepresentations to ethics authorities);

And BRYAN C. SCHROLL having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRYAN C. SCHROLL is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-204, concluding that BRYAN C. SCHROLL of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.3(lack of diligence); RPC 1.4(b)(failure to communicate with client); RPC 4.1(a)(l)(false statement of fact to third person); RPC 8.4(c)(dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); and RPC 8.1(a)(misrepresentations to ethics authorities);

And BRYAN C. SCHROLL having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRYAN C. SCHROLL is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.3d 1217, 213 N.J. 391, 2013 WL 1704879, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schroll-nj-2013.