In re Schrenkeisen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Schrenkeisen

174 A.D. 882

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Order confirming report of commissioners granted June 10, 1915, modified by striking therefrom the allowance, costs and disbursements made to James T. Magan, attorney for James E. Murtha, whose claim was rejected; and as so modified, it and the order granted June 10, 1915, denying appellants’ motion for a further and supplemental report, and the order granted July 7, 1915, denying appellants’motion to resettle the order confirming the report of the commissioners, are severally affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order confirming report of commissioners granted June 10, 1915, modified by striking therefrom the allowance, costs and disbursements made to James T. Magan, attorney for James E. Murtha, whose claim was rejected; and as so modified, it and the order granted June 10, 1915, denying appellants’ motion for a further and supplemental report, and the order granted July 7, 1915, denying appellants’motion to resettle the order confirming the report of the commissioners, are severally affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

In re Schrenkeisen, 174 A.D. 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

174 A.D. 882 (In re Schrenkeisen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.