In re Schragen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Schragen

669 A.2d 236, 143 N.J. 131, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 21

DecidedJanuary 16, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 669 A.2d 236 (In re Schragen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schragen, 669 A.2d 236, 143 N.J. 131, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 21 (N.J. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

JERALD A. SCHRAGEN of RAMSEY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, having been ordered to show cause on January 16,1996, why this Court’s Order of temporary suspension should not be continued pending the disposition of ethics proceedings against him, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the suspension of JERALD A SCHRA-GEN continue pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension [132]*132and that he continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics may transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund the attorney account funds held in any financial institution by JERALD A. SCHRAGEN, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of December 12, 1995.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

JERALD A. SCHRAGEN of RAMSEY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, having been ordered to show cause on January 16,1996, why this Court’s Order of temporary suspension should not be continued pending the disposition of ethics proceedings against him, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the suspension of JERALD A SCHRA-GEN continue pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension [132]*132and that he continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics may transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund the attorney account funds held in any financial institution by JERALD A. SCHRAGEN, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of December 12, 1995.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

669 A.2d 236, 143 N.J. 131, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schragen-nj-1996.