In re Schragen

667 A.2d 1056, 143 N.J. 31, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1440
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 19, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 667 A.2d 1056 (In re Schragen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Schragen, 667 A.2d 1056, 143 N.J. 31, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1440 (N.J. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court recommending that JERALD A. SCHRAGEN of RAMSEY, be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JERALD A. SCHRAGEN is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by JERALD A. SCHRA-GEN, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JERALD A. SCHRAGEN show cause before this Court on January 16, 1996, at 2:00 p.m., Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, New Jersey, why his temporary suspension and the restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any ethics proceedings pending against him and further why the funds restrained from disbursement should not be transmitted by the financial institutions who are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his desig-nee, present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JERALD A. SCHRAGEN be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension [32]*32and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 A.2d 1056, 143 N.J. 31, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schragen-nj-1995.