In re Schor

711 A.2d 291, 154 N.J. 81, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 559
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 3, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 711 A.2d 291 (In re Schor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Schor, 711 A.2d 291, 154 N.J. 81, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 559 (N.J. 1998).

Opinion

[82]*82ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on April 27, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that CLARK B. SCHOR of BELLEVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15 (failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements of Rule 1:21-6) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be temporarily suspended from the practice of law until the Office of Attorney Ethics is able to determine that respondent is complying fully with the recordkeeping requirements of Rule 1:21-6;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that on reinstatement to practice and for a period of two years thereafter, respondent should be required to provide to the Office of Attorney Ethics every six months a certification by a certified public accountant that respondent is complying fully with Rule 1:21-6;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CLARK B. SCHOR is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

[83]*83ORDERED that the suspension from practice continue until respondent demonstrates to the Office of Attorney Ethics that he is complying fully with Rule 1:21-6; and it is further

ORDERED that on reinstatement to practice, respondent shall provide to the Office of Attorney Ethics every six months for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court, a certification by a certified public accountant that respondent is complying fully with Rule 1:21-6; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 A.2d 291, 154 N.J. 81, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schor-nj-1998.