In Re School District No. 60

1937 OK 392, 69 P.2d 376, 180 Okla. 305, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 655
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 15, 1937
DocketNo. 26971.
StatusPublished

This text of 1937 OK 392 (In Re School District No. 60) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re School District No. 60, 1937 OK 392, 69 P.2d 376, 180 Okla. 305, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 655 (Okla. 1937).

Opinion

WELCH, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the county court of Carter county dismissing plaintiff in error’s appeal to that court from an order of the county superintendent of said county.

The essential facts are that the county superintendent changed the boundary line of school district No. 60 of said county by detaching from said district two quarter sections of land which he attached to adjoining consolidated school district 'No. 74. More than one-fourth of the. taxpayers residing- in district No. 60 signed and -filed notice of appeal, and such appeal was lodged in the county court.

It was there stipulated that none of the signers of the notice of appeal were taxpayers in that portion of school district No. 60 which was transferred to district No. 74, and the appellees in the county court filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending that an appeal could be taken only by resident taxpayers of the 320->acre tract which was detached from district No. 60.

We are controlled here by our decision in cause, In re Boundary Line of School District No. 62, Garter County, this day decided, 180 Okla. 297, 69 P. (2d) 367.

Upon that authority we hold that the appeal here taken to the county court whs authorized by chapter 34, article 1, S. L. 1931 (sections 6778-6780, inclusive, O. S. 1931), and that the county court erred in dismissing such appeal.

The judgment of the county court is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded to that court, with directions to deny motion to dismiss, and to proceed with the trial of the cause in that court.

OSBORN, O. J., BAYLESS, V. O. J., and RILEY, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. BUSBY and PHELPS, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re School District No. 62
1937 OK 393 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1937 OK 392, 69 P.2d 376, 180 Okla. 305, 1937 Okla. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-school-district-no-60-okla-1937.