In re Scholl

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 205
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 23, 1959
DocketNo. 36089
StatusPublished

This text of 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 205 (In re Scholl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Scholl, 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 205 (Ohio 1959).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The case presents the question whether the executor of an estate, defending actions against the estate based on promissory notes claimed to have been executed by defendant’s decedent and made payable to plaintiff, can require the plaintiff to give testimony by way of deposition where he is prohibited from testifying on trial by reason of Section 2317.03, [206]*206Revised Code, which provides in part that “a party shall not testify when the adverse party is * * * an executor,” with certain exceptions not involved herein. This court is of the opinion that the executor cannot.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of In re Renee, 159 Ohio St., 37, 42 A. L. R. (2d), 572.

Judgment affirmed.

Wbygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verbsky v. Burger
65 N.E.2d 695 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1946)
Stream v. Barnard
165 N.E. 727 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1929)
Prince, Exrx. v. Abersold
175 N.E. 862 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scholl-ohio-1959.