In re Schofield

193 U.S. 667, 24 S. Ct. 852, 48 L. Ed. 839, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 953
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 29, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 193 U.S. 667 (In re Schofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Schofield, 193 U.S. 667, 24 S. Ct. 852, 48 L. Ed. 839, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 953 (1904).

Opinion

Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of habeas corpus denied.

Mr. John Burke and Mr. Guy C. H. Corliss for petitioner in support of motion. Mr.- Solicitor General Hoyt opposing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 U.S. 667, 24 S. Ct. 852, 48 L. Ed. 839, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schofield-scotus-1904.