In re Schofield
This text of 693 A.2d 579 (In re Schofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 1997, Frederick S. Schofield, III, having been disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated September 25, 1996; the said Frederick S. Scho-field, III, having been directed on December 18,1996, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is
ORDERED that Frederick S. Schofield, III, is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 A.2d 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schofield-pa-1997.