Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/In re Schofield

In re Schofield

600 A.2d 1210, 126 N.J. 515, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1468
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1992·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that FREDERICK S. SCHOFIELD, III of BRIGANTINE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, be publicly reprimanded for improperly entering into a business transaction with clients in violation of RPC. 1.8, 8.4(a), and 8.4(c), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and FREDERICK S. SCHOFIELD, III is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Schofield, 600 A.2d 1210, 126 N.J. 515, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1468 (N.J. 1992).

600 A.2d 1210 (In re Schofield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.