In re Schofield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Schofield

600 A.2d 1210, 126 N.J. 515, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1468

DecidedJanuary 31, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 600 A.2d 1210 (In re Schofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schofield, 600 A.2d 1210, 126 N.J. 515, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1468 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that FREDERICK S. SCHOFIELD, III of BRIGANTINE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, be publicly reprimanded for improperly entering into a business transaction with clients in violation of RPC. 1.8, 8.4(a), and 8.4(c), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and FREDERICK S. SCHOFIELD, III is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that FREDERICK S. SCHOFIELD, III of BRIGANTINE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, be publicly reprimanded for improperly entering into a business transaction with clients in violation of RPC. 1.8, 8.4(a), and 8.4(c), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and FREDERICK S. SCHOFIELD, III is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

600 A.2d 1210, 126 N.J. 515, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schofield-nj-1992.