In re Schoer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Schoer

730 S.E.2d 855, 398 S.C. 590, 2012 WL 3038528, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 130

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 14, 2012

DocketNo. 2011-200646

StatusPublished

This text of 730 S.E.2d 855 (In re Schoer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schoer, 730 S.E.2d 855, 398 S.C. 590, 2012 WL 3038528, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 130 (S.C. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s Petition for Reinstatement. The petition is granted subject to the condition that, if he enters private practice, petitioner shall be required to enter into a mentoring agreement with an active member of the South Carolina Bar for two (2) years during which petitioner and the mentor shall meet on a monthly basis to discuss issues and concerns related to petitioner’s law practice and the mentor shall submit quarterly reports concerning petitioner’s compliance with his mentoring obligation to the Commission on Lawyer Conduct.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J. /s/COSTA M. PLEICONES, J. /s/DONALD W. BEATTY, J. /s/JOHN W. KITTREDGE, J. /s/KAYE G. HEARN, J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s Petition for Reinstatement. The petition is granted subject to the condition that, if he enters private practice, petitioner shall be required to enter into a mentoring agreement with an active member of the South Carolina Bar for two (2) years during which petitioner and the mentor shall meet on a monthly basis to discuss issues and concerns related to petitioner’s law practice and the mentor shall submit quarterly reports concerning petitioner’s compliance with his mentoring obligation to the Commission on Lawyer Conduct.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J. /s/COSTA M. PLEICONES, J. /s/DONALD W. BEATTY, J. /s/JOHN W. KITTREDGE, J. /s/KAYE G. HEARN, J.

FOR THE COURT

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

730 S.E.2d 855, 398 S.C. 590, 2012 WL 3038528, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schoer-sc-2012.