In re Schnitzer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Schnitzer

162 A.3d 290, 229 N.J. 335, 2017 WL 2598855, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 639

DecidedJune 15, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.3d 290 (In re Schnitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schnitzer, 162 A.3d 290, 229 N.J. 335, 2017 WL 2598855, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 639 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-134, concluding that the formal ethics complaint filed against STEPHEN SCHNITZER of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint against STEPHEN SCHNITZER in District Docket No. VC-2010-0027E, is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-134, concluding that the formal ethics complaint filed against STEPHEN SCHNITZER of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence of unethical conduct, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint against STEPHEN SCHNITZER in District Docket No. VC-2010-0027E, is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.3d 290, 229 N.J. 335, 2017 WL 2598855, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schnitzer-nj-2017.