In Re Schneider
This text of 148 U.S. 157 (In Re Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
13 S.Ct. 572
37 L.Ed. 404
In re SCHNEIDER.
No. ____.
March 14, 1893.
Jeremiah M. Wilson, William F. Mattingly, and A. A. Hoehling, Jr., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 158-162 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.
The application for a writ of error or appeal is denied upon the authority of Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 22; In re Heath, 144 U. S. 92, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 615; In re Cross, 146 U. S. 271, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 109; Cross v. U. S., 145 U. S. 571, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 842. See, also, Railroad Co. v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398; Dennison v. Alexander, 103 U. S. 522; U. S. v. Wanamaker, 147 U. S. 149, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 279.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 U.S. 157, 13 S. Ct. 572, 37 L. Ed. 404, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schneider-scotus-1893.