In re Schneider

24 A.D.3d 225, 804 N.Y.S.2d 920
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 13, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.3d 225 (In re Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Schneider, 24 A.D.3d 225, 804 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Order, Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County (Lee L. Holzman, S.), entered on or about February 24, 2004, which, in a probate proceeding, upon the proponent’s motion to reargue, adhered to a prior order awarding compensation to the objectant’s guardian ad litem, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although the compensation awarded the guardian ad litem is sizeable in comparison to the estate, we are satisfied that the Surrogate gave that factor appropriate weight in an exercise of discretion that, in view of the services rendered, was appropriately “conservative” (cf. Matter of Burk, 6 AD2d 429 [1958]; see Matter of Hassett, 47 AD2d 569, 570 [1975]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dowd v. Pinto
49 A.D.3d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.3d 225, 804 N.Y.S.2d 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schneider-nyappdiv-2005.