In re Schmidt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Schmidt

256 A.D. 827, 10 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5039

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 827 (In re Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schmidt, 256 A.D. 827, 10 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

On argument, order denying appellant’s application for an enlargement of time within which to make her election relating to dower and to make her election to take her share of decedent’s estate as in intestacy reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, application granted, and time to make an election enlarged until ten days after the determination of the appeal from the decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county, entered December 10, 1938, construing the will of decedent and adjudicating appellant’s rights thereunder, on condition that said appeal be perfected and brought on for argument at the February, 1939, term. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On argument, order denying appellant’s application for an enlargement of time within which to make her election relating to dower and to make her election to take her share of decedent’s estate as in intestacy reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, application granted, and time to make an election enlarged until ten days after the determination of the appeal from the decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county, entered December 10, 1938, construing the will of decedent and adjudicating appellant’s rights thereunder, on condition that said appeal be perfected and brought on for argument at the February, 1939, term. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 827, 10 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schmidt-nyappdiv-1939.