In re Schmeling

717 A.2d 993, 156 N.J. 369, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 1139
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 6, 1998·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court pursuant to Rule l:20-3(g) and Rule 1:20-11 recommending that WILLIAM E. SCHMELING of MANAS-QUAN who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM E. SCHMELING is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by WILLIAM E. SCHMELING, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that WILLIAM E. SCHMELING be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Schmeling, 717 A.2d 993, 156 N.J. 369, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 1139 (N.J. 1998).

717 A.2d 993 (In re Schmeling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.