In Re Schlitzer
Opinion
DECISION & ORDER
BACKGROUND
On October 20, 2005, Peter G. Schlitzer (the “Debtor”) filed a pro se petition initiating a Chapter 13 Case. The Debtor failed to file the Schedules and Statements required by Section 521 and Rule 1007, his Chapter 13 Monthly and Disposable Income Form or a Chapter 13 Plan. On November 2, 2005, George M. Reiber, the standing Chapter 13 Trustee (the “Trustee”), filed a Motion (the “Motion”) under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h)(2), a new Code provision under the recently enacted Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005.
In the Motion, the Trustee requested that the Court enter an Order extending the automatic stay and determining that all property of the Debtor continued to be property of the estate beyond the time limits imposed by Section 362(h). 1
*857 Section 362(h) provides that if an individual debtor’s statement of intention is not filed as required by 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(2), 2 then the automatic stay with respect to personal property that secures a claim will be terminated and such property will no longer be property of the estate.
The Motion asserted that: (1) Section 362(h) was unreasonable because before the 30-day time limit provided for in Section 521 expired, a Chapter 13 trustee would not normally have had the opportunity at a 341 meeting to adequately investigate both the value of personal property listed in the Schedules or the validity and the extent of any alleged liens; (2) the situation was further exacerbated in this case where the Debtor had not filed any Schedules, making it impossible for the Trustee to conduct any investigation prior to the expiration of the time limit; (3) the Trustee brought the Motion prior to the expiration of the time limit because, to the extent applicable, Section 362(h) requires that any such motion must be brought before the expiration of the time limit; and (4) the notice of the Motion was sent to all creditors, because in the absence of any Schedules, the Trustee did not have sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to whether there were any secured creditors, and, if there were, what, if any, collateral existed.
At a hearing held on November 16, 2005, the Trustee reaffirmed the arguments in his Motion and indicated that: (1) he initiated the Motion out of an abundance of caution so that the Court could make a determination as to whether the requirements imposed on a debtor under Section 521(a)(2) and the new Section 362(h) early stay termination applied to Chapter 13 *858 debtors; and (2) he believed that the duties set forth in Section 521(a)(2) applied only to individual Chapter 7 debtors with property securing consumer debts.
DISCUSSION
When the plain language of Section 521(a)(2), which specifically states “... within thirty days after the date of filing of a petition under chapter 7 of this title,” is read together with Section 362(h), which refers specifically to the failure of a debtor to comply with the requirements of Section 521(a)(2), it is clear that the requirement that a debtor file a statement of intention applies only in cases filed under Chapter 7. See, e.g., L. King, 6 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 362.10A at 362-119 (15th ed.1998) (stating that although Section 362(h) is not by its terms limited to cases brought under Chapter 7, when read together with Section 521, it is clear that an early stay termination under Section 362(h) can occur only in a Chapter 7 case).
CONCLUSION
The Trustee’s Motion is denied. Section 362(h) is not applicable in a Chapter 13 case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
332 B.R. 856 (In Re Schlitzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.