In re Schlem
This text of 761 A.2d 87 (In re Schlem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on May 8, 2000, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that STUART P. SCHLEM of MANALAPAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating R. 1:21-6 (recordkeep-ing requirements), RPC 1.15(d) (requiring compliance with R. 1:21-6), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that STUART P. SCHLEM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
761 A.2d 87, 165 N.J. 536, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schlem-nj-2000.