in Re Schkerezade Midkiff
This text of in Re Schkerezade Midkiff (in Re Schkerezade Midkiff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Majority and Dissenting Memorandum Opinions filed November 19, 2020.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-20-00561-CV
IN RE SCHKEREZADE MIDKIFF, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 129th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-07161
MAJORITY MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 12, 2020, relator Schkerezade Midkiff filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Michael Gomez, presiding judge of the 129th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his September 13, 2019 order granting the motion to compel arbitration filed by Igloo Products, Corp. Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant. (Spain, J., dissenting).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Schkerezade Midkiff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schkerezade-midkiff-texapp-2020.