In re Schiller

379 S.E.2d 898, 298 S.C. 293, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 94
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 16, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 379 S.E.2d 898 (In re Schiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Schiller, 379 S.E.2d 898, 298 S.C. 293, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 94 (S.C. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

On March 22, 1989, the Court signed an Order under Section 29 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure ashing for a statement from the Respondent as to why South Carolina should not impose an identical discipline as Florida. Since there was no statement filed by Mr. Schiller in opposition,

It is hereby ordered that John J. Schiller be suspended from the practice of law in South Carolina for a period of two years from the date of this Order. His readmission to practice law in South Carolina is contingent upon his readmission to the Bar in the State of Florida.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. State
383 S.E.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 S.E.2d 898, 298 S.C. 293, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schiller-sc-1989.