In re Schibell

169 A.3d 489, 230 N.J. 455
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 21, 2017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-183, concluding that RICHARD D. SCHI-BELL of OCEAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, should be censured for violating RPC 1.15(a)(commingling), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping), RPC 8.1(a)(know-ingly making false statements of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter), and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD D. SCHIBELL is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire .record of this matter be made a permanent part ofi respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual [456] expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Schibell, 169 A.3d 489, 230 N.J. 455 (N.J. 2017).

169 A.3d 489 (In re Schibell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.