In re Schepeler

21 F. Cas. 686, 3 Ben. 346
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Schepeler. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 F. Cas. 686
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 15, 1869·Published

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The proper course, in this case, was for the register, under sections 42 and 12, to adjourn the meeting of creditors to a day certain, on the ground that the notice to the creditors had not been given as required in the warrant, and to direct the giving, for the adjourned day, of a new notice, in respect of the serving by mail or personally, but not in respect of the publication; but, as there has been no adjournment, the proceedings have fallen through, and there must be a new warrant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Schepeler, 21 F. Cas. 686, 3 Ben. 346 (S.D.N.Y. 1869).

21 F. Cas. 686 (In re Schepeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.