In re Schepeler
21 F. Cas. 686, 3 Ben. 346
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Schepeler. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 F. Cas. 686 →
Opinion
The proper course, in this case, was for the register, under sections 42 and 12, to adjourn the meeting of creditors to a day certain, on the ground that the notice to the creditors had not been given as required in the warrant, and to direct the giving, for the adjourned day, of a new notice, in respect of the serving by mail or personally, but not in respect of the publication; but, as there has been no adjournment, the proceedings have fallen through, and there must be a new warrant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Schepeler, 21 F. Cas. 686, 3 Ben. 346 (S.D.N.Y. 1869).
21 F. Cas. 686 (In re Schepeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.